Politics

Kavanaugh Accuser’s Lawyer Asked If She Has Proof, Her Response Is Beyond Absurd

The lawyer representing Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh of assaulting her more than 30 years ago, said that it’s not her client’s responsibility to prove her claims.

You read that right. The attorney, Debra Katz, does not believe an accuser should have to prove crimes have taken place. They merely have to say “I was assaulted” and everyone should believe them, proof be damned.

While on CNN, a network one would think would be doing everything it could to demonize Kavanaugh, Katz stunned host Alisyn Camerota with her response when asked “has your client spoken to any of those other guys or that girl who could help corroborate her story?”

“She has not,” Katz said. The reason being? According to Katz, “That’s not her job to do that. If this is going to be investigated, it should be done by investigators.”

Supposedly, Katz has a law degree, so there’s at least some expectation she knows how the law works. Alas, her response shows that she has no clue how crimes work. Katz, as well as a multitude of Democrat lawmakers, believe that someone should be able to say “this person committed a crime,” and have everyone believe them.

That means, someone should be able to say “I was robbed” without having to prove what was taken. Or “someone hit my car” without having to show proof of any damage.

Hell, we could all say “Hillary Clinton raped me” and by the laws of Democrats, we would HAVE to be believed! You see how ridiculous that sounds, right?

Sadly, that’s how many people think the world should work. You should be able to accuse someone of whatever crime you want, and people should automatically take your side.

Furthermore, Katz says “if this is going to be investigated,” as though she’s unaware of the fact that the FBI isn’t looking into it. There’s no point. Ford has no idea when or where the events of the supposed “assault” took place, and yet she expects the FBI to magically go back in time and find out for her? That’s just not how the FBI conducts an investigation.

Ford has been invited to share her testimony in front of the judiciary committee, but she has declined to do so, citing that she wants to wait for the investigation (that will never happen) to come first.

We all know these are just tactics to delay Kavanaugh’s confirmation, but this is just plain absurd.

Kavanaugh has vehemently denied the allegations, saying “this is a completely false allegation. I have never done anything like what the accuser describes—to her or to anyone.”

“This never happened, I had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself.”

Kavanaugh added that “I am willing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee in any way the Committee deems appropriate to refute this false allegation, from 36 years ago, and defend my integrity.”

How absurd is it that people would demand the FBI look into a high school party that occurred over three decades ago than look into Hillary’s deleted emails… Something smells fishy, and I’m not standing near any water.