Judicial Watch has incredible news in their pursuit of the truth in regards to the Clinton email scandal.
Following Trump’s election, the email issue sort of just went away. The media stopped talking about it. Trump stopped talking about it. While it was slipping away from consciousness concerned patriots were working diligently to make sure we find the truth.
You might have read about the hearing in regards to the Clinton emails a few weeks ago, but just in case, HERE is a quick refresher.
After years of fighting through red tape, and government blocking, Judicial Watch was able to put the Clintons back on the defense. This from the organizations official website:
Judicial Watch announced today that a federal judge granted seven additional depositions, three interrogatories and four document requests related to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private, unauthorized email server. Hillary Clinton and her former top aide and current lawyer Cheryl Mills were given 30 days to oppose being deposed by Judicial Watch.
The court rejected Justice and State Department arguments to protect Clinton and the agencies from additional discovery and ordered agency lawyers to respond to Judicial Watch’s questions about their knowledge of the Clinton email issue. The court granted all of Judicial Watch’s requested discovery but gave Clinton and Mills 30 days to file any opposition to the requests to question them in person under oath.
The new court-ordered discovery allows Judicial Watch to take testimony and gather evidence of Clinton’s handling of emails, specifically in an “after action memo” drafted by Heather Samuelson, Clinton’s senior advisor at State and White House liaison. The memo was created in December 2014 to memorialize the Clinton team’s processing of the Clinton emails. The discovery also asks for when Justice and State Department attorneys learned about Clinton’s private email use; and what senior records-keeping officials at the State Department knew about Clinton’s emails and when they knew it.
Judicial Watch’s president Tom Fitton was able to elaborate on why the court ruled in their favor:
“Judicial Watch uncovered the Clinton email scandal and we just found more evidence that raises further questions about the cover-up – which is why the court allowed us to pursue more leads and potentially question Mrs. Clinton under oath. As ordered by the court, Judicial Watch will continue to ‘shake the tree’ on the Clinton email issue. It is shameful that the Justice and State Departments oppose our efforts and are still trying to provide cover for Hillary Clinton.”
At the very least Hillary Clinton has to oppose Judicial Watch’s request, but why would she do that? Sure, democrats will say “she’s been through this before”, but a federal court just said that there’s enough evidence to bring her in for questioning.
Don’t expect to hear this from anyone in the MSM, which is why it’s up to YOU to get the word out.